WHEN we see anyone handle an axe awkwardly, we do not say, "Where is the use
of this art? See how ill carpenters perform."
But we say the very contrary, "This man is no
carpenter, for he handles an axe awkwardly." So,
if we hear anyone sing badly, we do not say,
"Observe how musicians sing," but rather, "This
fellow is no musician." It is with regard to philosophy
alone that people are thus affected. When
they see anyone acting contrary to the profession
of a philosopher, they do not take away his title;
but laying it down that he is a philosopher, and
then assuming from the very fact that he behaves
indecently, they infer that philosophy is of no use.
"What, then, is the reason of this?" Because
we pay some regard to the preconception which
we have of a carpenter and a musician and so of
other artists, but not of a philosopher, which being
thus vague and confused, we judge of it only from
external appearances. And of what other art do
we take up our judgment from the dress?
EPICTETUS. DISCOURSES. Book iv. §8. ¶1.
No comments:
Post a Comment